No subject


Tue Dec 2 04:10:01 GMT 2003


the DC is a Windows box.  Is that correct?

Here's the odd thing...  The 1C name is a group name.  It should not be
in conflict at all.  The only way I know of (assuming that this is a
Windows/NT box) to cause the Conflict stat is for some other node to
send a directed "NAME CONFLICT DEMAND" or "NAME RELEASE REQUEST DEMAND"
to the node.

Can you scan your networks and look for the same name as a unique name?
That shouldn't be the problem but...  If some other node is registering
DOMAIN<1C> as a unique name it could cause trouble.

Perhaps something else is going on.  The handling of #1C names is very
strange.  The WINS server is supposed to list all of the IP addresses
(up to 25 of them) of the DOMAIN<1C> name, but it is also supposed to
force the IP address of the DOMAIN<1B> name to the top of the #1C IP
list.  [Goofy as all getout, but that's how you identify the PDC from
the list of IPs in the #1C entry.  Yes, really.  Geez.]

Anyway, if anything is messed up in the WINS database, or if some node
is sending out bogus "NAME CONFLICT DEMAND" or "NAME RELEASE REQUEST
DEMAND" messages, or if there is a conflicting #1C unique name... then
you would get the conflict status.

Chris -)-----

Andrew Esh wrote:
> 
> What causes this conflict condition in the PDC #1c nmblookup info?
> This causes Samba not to be able to authenticate with the given
> domain controller. Of course, if the smb.conf "password server"
> parameter has another (good) DC listed, we get past this, but it
> kills Samba in single-DC environments. I've seen this twice in the
> last three weeks, in two unrelated domains. If the DC is rebooted,
> the conflict goes away, and Samba can authenticate again.
> 
> (NetBIOS Names and IPs changed to protect the innocent, but the
> output is real.)
> 
> # nmblookup -A 2.4.6.8
> 
> Local Area Connection:
> Node IpAddress: [2.4.6.8] Scope Id: []
> 
>            NetBIOS Remote Machine Name Table
> 
>        Name               Type         Status
>     ---------------------------------------------
>     DC             <00>  UNIQUE      Registered
>     DC             <20>  UNIQUE      Registered
>     DOMAIN         <00>  GROUP       Registered
>     DOMAIN         <1C>  GROUP       Conflict
>     DOMAIN         <1B>  UNIQUE      Registered
>     DOMAIN         <1E>  GROUP       Registered
>     DC             <03>  UNIQUE      Registered
>     DOMAIN         <1D>  UNIQUE      Registered
>     ..__MSBROWSE__.<01>  GROUP       Registered
> 
>     MAC Address = 00-01-02-03-04-05
> 
> --
> Andrew C. Esh              mail:Andrew.Esh at tricord.com
> Tricord Systems, Inc.
> 2905 Northwest Blvd., Suite 20   763-557-9005 (main)
> Plymouth, MN 55441-2644 USA      763-551-6418 (direct)
> http://www.tricord.com - Tricord Home Page

-- 
Christopher R. Hertel -)-----                   University of Minnesota
crh at nts.umn.edu              Networking and Telecommunications Services

------_=_NextPart_001_01C1E4AF.EC81B120
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2650.12">
<TITLE>RE: nmblookup conflict</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>Yes, the DC is Windows. NT in one case. Not sure about the one that produced this (sanitized) output.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Christopher R. Hertel [<A HREF="mailto:crh at umn.edu">mailto:crh at umn.edu</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:49 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: aesh at tricord.com</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Cc: samba-technical at lists.samba.org</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: Re: nmblookup conflict</FONT>
</P>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>From the output (because the MAC address is given) it looks as though</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>the DC is a Windows box.&nbsp; Is that correct?</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>Here's the odd thing...&nbsp; The 1C name is a group name.&nbsp; It should not be</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>in conflict at all.&nbsp; The only way I know of (assuming that this is a</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Windows/NT box) to cause the Conflict stat is for some other node to</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>send a directed &quot;NAME CONFLICT DEMAND&quot; or &quot;NAME RELEASE REQUEST DEMAND&quot;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>to the node.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>Can you scan your networks and look for the same name as a unique name?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>That shouldn't be the problem but...&nbsp; If some other node is registering</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>DOMAIN&lt;1C&gt; as a unique name it could cause trouble.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>Perhaps something else is going on.&nbsp; The handling of #1C names is very</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>strange.&nbsp; The WINS server is supposed to list all of the IP addresses</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>(up to 25 of them) of the DOMAIN&lt;1C&gt; name, but it is also supposed to</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>force the IP address of the DOMAIN&lt;1B&gt; name to the top of the #1C IP</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>list.&nbsp; [Goofy as all getout, but that's how you identify the PDC from</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>the list of IPs in the #1C entry.&nbsp; Yes, really.&nbsp; Geez.]</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>Anyway, if anything is messed up in the WINS database, or if some node</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>is sending out bogus &quot;NAME CONFLICT DEMAND&quot; or &quot;NAME RELEASE REQUEST</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>DEMAND&quot; messages, or if there is a conflicting #1C unique name... then</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>you would get the conflict status.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>Chris -)-----</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>Andrew Esh wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; What causes this conflict condition in the PDC #1c nmblookup info?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; This causes Samba not to be able to authenticate with the given</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; domain controller. Of course, if the smb.conf &quot;password server&quot;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; parameter has another (good) DC listed, we get past this, but it</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; kills Samba in single-DC environments. I've seen this twice in the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; last three weeks, in two unrelated domains. If the DC is rebooted,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; the conflict goes away, and Samba can authenticate again.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; (NetBIOS Names and IPs changed to protect the innocent, but the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; output is real.)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; # nmblookup -A 2.4.6.8</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; Local Area Connection:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; Node IpAddress: [2.4.6.8] Scope Id: []</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; NetBIOS Remote Machine Name Table</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Name&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Type&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Status</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ---------------------------------------------</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; DC&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &lt;00&gt;&nbsp; UNIQUE&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Registered</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; DC&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &lt;20&gt;&nbsp; UNIQUE&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Registered</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; DOMAIN&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &lt;00&gt;&nbsp; GROUP&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Registered</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; DOMAIN&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &lt;1C&gt;&nbsp; GROUP&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Conflict</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; DOMAIN&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &lt;1B&gt;&nbsp; UNIQUE&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Registered</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; DOMAIN&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &lt;1E&gt;&nbsp; GROUP&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Registered</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; DC&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &lt;03&gt;&nbsp; UNIQUE&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Registered</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; DOMAIN&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &lt;1D&gt;&nbsp; UNIQUE&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Registered</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ..__MSBROWSE__.&lt;01&gt;&nbsp; GROUP&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Registered</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; MAC Address = 00-01-02-03-04-05</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; --</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; Andrew C. Esh&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; mail:Andrew.Esh at tricord.com</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; Tricord Systems, Inc.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; 2905 Northwest Blvd., Suite 20&nbsp;&nbsp; 763-557-9005 (main)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; Plymouth, MN 55441-2644 USA&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 763-551-6418 (direct)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; <A HREF="http://www.tricord.com" TARGET="_blank">http://www.tricord.com</A> - Tricord Home Page</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>-- </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Christopher R. Hertel -)-----&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; University of Minnesota</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>crh at nts.umn.edu&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Networking and Telecommunications Services</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1E4AF.EC81B120--




More information about the samba-technical mailing list