Samba 2.2.x with small mod manages to survive three rounds in the ring with NetBench 7.0.3 and two engines on one client

[Richard Sharpe]

On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 jra at dp.samba.org wrote:

> Patch please ? :-). Well done btw.

OK, here is the patch. 

What I don't understand is the function of the 0x10 bit in the flags field 
of an NTCreate&X. Win2K servers do not seem to add the 0x8000 bit when an 
oplock is granted, and I have seen the Action field (smb_action below) in 
the response take values of 0xaa, 0xac, 0xae, as well as 0x01, 0x02.

So, while this seems to fix the problem I was seeing, it needs to be 
explained.

 diff -u ../depot-trunk/src/samba/source/smbd/nttrans.c  
src/samba/source/smbd/nttrans.c
--- ../depot-trunk/src/samba/source/smbd/nttrans.c	Fri Apr 18 
15:12:24 2003+++ src/samba/source/smbd/nttrans.c	Fri Apr 18 
13:34:31 2003
@@ -913,12 +913,12 @@
 	 * correct bit for extended oplock reply.
 	 */
 	
-	if (oplock_request && lp_fake_oplocks(SNUM(conn)))
+/*	if (oplock_request && lp_fake_oplocks(SNUM(conn)))
 		smb_action |= EXTENDED_OPLOCK_GRANTED;
 	
 	if(oplock_request && EXCLUSIVE_OPLOCK_TYPE(fsp->oplock_type))
 		smb_action |= EXTENDED_OPLOCK_GRANTED;
-
+*/
 #if 1 /* JRATEST */
 	/* W2K sends back 42 words here ! */
 	set_message(outbuf,42,0,True);



Regards
-----
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, 
sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com