segfaults in pam_smbpass in SAMBA_3_0 with unixsam backend

Steve Langasek vorlon at
Fri Oct 25 03:12:00 GMT 2002

On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:39:58AM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:

> > And thanks for the quick fix.  There's still a problem in the nisplus
> > backend, I believe; a chunk of private_data is allocated but never
> > freed.  Fortunately, this is a mere memory leak, and not a segfault. :)

> It's in, thanks!

> If you do have a nisplus server there, could you re-check whether
> nisplussam works 100% correctly? I converted it to the new passdb
> interface at CIFS this summer, but I haven't been able to test it
> since I don't have a nisplus server around.

Afraid I don't... was just looking over the code, and noticed that
nisplus would have the same problem that unixsam would.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the samba-technical mailing list