how to deal with STATUS_PIPE_BUSY ?

[Tim Potter]

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:17:34AM -0700, Ben Johnson wrote:

> This is part of a packet dump that ends with the STATUS_PIPE_BUSY.  If I
> remove the user from just a few groups then I never get the
> STATUS_PIPE_BUSY message and the second request goes through.  But
> nothing else (that I see so far) about the dump overall changes.

That's a bit strange.  I can't think of a good explanation as to why
that is happening.

> Do you think I just need to wait a little while then resend the request?
> Is it just that NT needs some time to rearrange its buffers or something?
> That doesn't make much sense to me, but I can't figure out what else it
> would be.

Yes.  I haven't had a chance to try this out with any of the Samba
daemons so please let me know if this works.


Tim.