samba netbios / namedpipes domination: a comparison with linu x having a proprietary web server built-in

[Luke Howard]

Don't forget that Windows 2000 seems to use ncacn_ip_tcp a lot more (for example,
the Netlogon and DRS RPCs are over this, not ncacn_np). Maybe the DCE RPC
named pipes transport will be less important as time goes by.

-- Luke

>From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at samba-tng.org>
>Subject: Re: samba netbios / namedpipes domination: a comparison with linu x having a proprietary web server built-in
>To: tng-technical at lists.dcerpc.org
>Cc: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>, samba-technical at samba.org, freedce-dev at lists.dcerpc.net
>Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:38:14 +0000
>
>hiya, i don't have much time to read this in detail, ntb,
>but i just wanted to say that the ideal scenario would
>be for SAMBA-3 to have an option
>
>"named pipe module" = tng_ncacn_np.so
>
>and for that to be an implementation of the
>"Named Pipe RFC" i posted, yesterday.
>
>lkcl
>
>On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:12:19PM +0300, ntb at mts.ru wrote:
>
>> Jeremy Allison wrote:
> 
>
>> > Exactly. Plug-in's are great. Plug-in's will make what Luke wants much easier.
>> 
>> Not so fast, please. Plugin (in form Andrew described before) allows only
>> adding an rpc service on additional pipe (an one samba is not listening itself
>> [....]
>

--
Luke Howard | lukehoward.com
PADL Software | www.padl.com