samba netbios / namedpipes domination: a comparison with linu x having a proprietary web server built-in

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton]

hiya, i don't have much time to read this in detail, ntb,
but i just wanted to say that the ideal scenario would
be for SAMBA-3 to have an option

"named pipe module" = tng_ncacn_np.so

and for that to be an implementation of the
"Named Pipe RFC" i posted, yesterday.

lkcl

On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:12:19PM +0300, ntb at mts.ru wrote:

> Jeremy Allison wrote:
 

> > Exactly. Plug-in's are great. Plug-in's will make what Luke wants much easier.
> 
> Not so fast, please. Plugin (in form Andrew described before) allows only
> adding an rpc service on additional pipe (an one samba is not listening itself
> [....]