samba netbios / namedpipes domination: a comparison with linu x having a proprietary web server built-in

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl at
Wed Jan 9 17:10:34 GMT 2002

hiya, i don't have much time to read this in detail, ntb,
but i just wanted to say that the ideal scenario would
be for SAMBA-3 to have an option

"named pipe module" =

and for that to be an implementation of the
"Named Pipe RFC" i posted, yesterday.


On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:12:19PM +0300, ntb at wrote:

> Jeremy Allison wrote:

> > Exactly. Plug-in's are great. Plug-in's will make what Luke wants much easier.
> Not so fast, please. Plugin (in form Andrew described before) allows only
> adding an rpc service on additional pipe (an one samba is not listening itself
> [....]

More information about the samba-technical mailing list