Samba & DMCA
yak at jet.msk.su
Thu Feb 21 06:47:02 GMT 2002
> 1) Microsoft reversing their previous position
> of encouraging use of the CIFS protocol,
> and it's standardization by the IETF,
There is no need for that as Samba Project did some
reverse-engineering of some Microsoft-specific authorization
protocols. Or I missed something ?
> 2) establishing or interpreting portions of
> the protocol as "anti-circumvention"
> measures, and
I don't really understand this. That does this mean?
> 3) commencement of a suit against a team
> they have in the past supported, including
> flying members to the first SMB conferences.
I think there is no problem for Microsoft. They prove it
More information about the samba-technical