AW: SAMBA_2.2 and spinlocks

[Hans-Jorg Wolff]

> On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 06:54:25AM +0200, Hans-J?rg Wolff wrote:
> > When using spinlocks and changing the answer of this_is_smp() to 1 we
> > encountered no longer any problems with a dual-PIII server and
> Visual FoxPro
> > application which crashes regulary on previous version of 2.2.x
>
> Well the spinlocks shouldn't make any difference to the internal
> tdb logic, which should work the same whether spinlocks or fcntl
> lock are used.