Fw: Re: Implemented OPLOCK for FreeBsd
Jeremy Allison
jra at samba.org
Fri Sep 7 20:01:40 GMT 2001
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 07:57:39PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> Any failures are handled at allocation time when registering a new
> event, and reported to the application.
Oh. Just read this more closely. Isn't this the same as:
-------------------------------------------------------
The function sigqueue() causes the signal specified by signo to be sent
with the value specified by value to the process specified by pid.
......
If any of the
conditions below occur, the sigqueue() function shall return -1 and set
errno to the corresponding value:
[EAGAIN] No resources available to queue the signal. The process
has already queued SIGQUEUE_MAX signals that are still
pending at the receivers, or a system wide resource limit
has been exceeded.
--------------------------------------------------------
Sounds suspiciously the same to me...... :-).
Remember, the oplock break message has to be
sent from the kernel, not another smbd. So resource
limits are still a problem aren't they ?
Jeremy.
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list