2nd post.locking problem, is it fixed?inCVS?
DavidB at mail.interclean.com
Tue Jun 26 18:21:32 GMT 2001
I tried the 2-machine test on the HEAD CVS from about a week ago (haven't
recompiled since) and it passed. Passed for two instances on the same
machine, too. The clients are WinNT 4.0 Workstation machines, server is
Linux with a 2.4.5 kernel.
From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:jeremy at valinux.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 12:01 PM
To: Nehemiah, Mark
Cc: 'samba-technical at samba.org'
Subject: Re: 2nd post.locking problem, is it fixed?inCVS?
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 08:39:39AM -0500, Nehemiah, Mark wrote:
> thanks for the info. I did download current cvs yesterday, and
> similar problems. I also just subscribed to samba-tech. wasn't sure
> to post. I'd be happy to help troubleshoot as much as possible. I really
> would like to keep up to date on this, as I really would like to use samba
> for our network. We have offices in 13 countries in Europe, and I am
> considering linux, samba for all of them as well if we can get it to work
> for us. seems like remote administration would be great, compared to
> dir,or netware, etc.
I've been running testlock.exe on one Win2k machine against
the current CVS and it passes all tests. I'm intending to do
a 2 machine test when I have a little more time, but I'm not
currently seeing any problems.
Can you be more specific about what your test environment ?
More information about the samba-technical