I think MS just did us (and themselves) a disservice.
sharpe at ns.aus.com
Wed Jan 10 23:30:41 GMT 2001
At 04:44 PM 1/10/01 -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
>> This is suboptimal, though, because if server, and user and workgroup are
>> the same, we should be able to put the new share request down the same TCP
>> connection, but if user is different, then we will automatically create a
>> new connection.
>In the case where Samba is the server, would reusing the existing
>connection reduce the number of spawned smbd daemons?
Ummm, yes, and it will probably reduce resource consumption on Windows as
well, as I suspect they spawn a new thread for each TCP connection.
>In any case, it sounds like a worth-while optimization.
>Christopher R. Hertel -)----- University of Minnesota
>crh at nts.umn.edu Networking and Telecommunications Services
> Ideals are like stars; you will not succeed in touching them
> with your hands...you choose them as your guides, and following
> them you will reach your destiny. --Carl Schultz
Richard Sharpe, sharpe at ns.aus.com
Samba (Team member, www.samba.org), Ethereal (Team member, www.zing.org)
Contributing author, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours
Author, Special Edition, Using Samba
More information about the samba-technical