I think MS just did us (and themselves) a disservice.

[Martin Kuhne]

What you fail to recognize is that even 3.51 (don't know about 3.1) can
have multiple user contexts being active at the same time. (For example
a service running under its own user account) The limit mentioned in the
article is per user, not per workstation. The author of the article got
that wrong, probably because at that time Windows NT would allow only
one interactive GUI session.

I don't know your definition of multi-user, but what do you call
Terminal Server then?

Exactly.  It's typical blinders-on, "microsoft is evil" mentality.
Certainly disappointing, but not surprising.

Regards,
Martin Kuhne
Escalation Engineer, Critical Problem Resolution (CPR)
Microsoft GmbH

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Colby [mailto:kevinc at grainsystems.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 12:30 AM
To: Christopher R. Hertel
Cc: Francois Gouget; samba-technical at samba.org
Subject: Re: I think MS just did us (and themselves) a disservice.


"Christopher R. Hertel" wrote:
> 
> Because there are effectively no multi-user Windows OSes, this isn't a
> problem from MS's point of view.

Exactly.  It's typical blinders-on, single-user system mentality.
Certainly disappointing, but not surprising.

	- Kevin Colby
	  kevinc at grainsytems.com