a much improved smbprint script.
Richard Sharpe
sharpe at ns.aus.com
Mon Dec 10 16:38:01 GMT 2001
Helge Blischke wrote:
>Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>>
>>>Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>>
>>>OK, another problem I have is that ${param:+word} does not look portable.
>>>
>>because it's not portable. I tried something similiar once (with i18n
>>manpages) and it failed with c-shells. If you really need it to be
>>one-line command, use sed. I know, relying on sed is not the best
>>example of portability, but it's used anyway in samba scripts.
>>
>>From my experience, that construct is common to all Bourne shells and
>supported as well by ksh and bash on all UNIXes I've seen so far (about
>a
>dozen variants). And, by beginning the first line of a script with
>"#!/bin/sh" (without the quotes, of course), the use of sh is forced.
>
Does that include ULTRIX and SCO, and DG/UG?
--
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe at ns.aus.com, LPIC-1
www.samba.org, www.ethereal.com, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba
in 24 Hours, Special Edition, Using Samba
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list