NTLMSSP in Extended security negotiation...

Mayers, Philip J p.mayers at ic.ac.uk
Tue Nov 21 16:06:27 GMT 2000


Hmm. Ok, doing this (is this the right CVS branch?):

cvs -d
:pserver:anoncvs at anoncvs.dcerpc.org:/home/vhosts/samba-tng.org/cvsroot login
cvs -z3 -d
:pserver:anoncvs at anoncvs.dcerpc.org:/home/vhosts/samba-tng.org/cvsroot co
tng

I see client support in libsmb/cliconnect.c, but no server-side support?
Cool, and I'll no doubt make use of it. FWIW, the NTLMSSP is not important
or interesting to me except in that it needs to exist - I'm much more
interested in the GSSAPI side of things, which are progressing well - I
expect to make significant progress this week.

My apparent tardiness *does* have an explanation, which you'll all hear soon
enough...

Regards,
Phil

+----------------------------------+
| Phil Mayers, Network Support     |
| Centre for Computing Services    |
| Imperial College                 |
+----------------------------------+  

-----Original Message-----
From: Mayers, Philip J [mailto:p.mayers at ic.ac.uk]
Sent: 21 November 2000 15:51
To: 'Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton'; 'samba-technical at samba.org'
Subject: RE: NTLMSSP in Extended security negotiation...


Well, obviously not, otherwise I wouldn't have been implementing it in
HEAD...

How suitable for rollback into HEAD is the code?

Regards,
Phil

+----------------------------------+
| Phil Mayers, Network Support     |
| Centre for Computing Services    |
| Imperial College                 |
+----------------------------------+  

-----Original Message-----
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [mailto:lkcl at samba.org]
Sent: 21 November 2000 15:31
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: NTLMSSP in Extended security negotiation...


phil,

you do realise that NTLMSSP on CAP_EXTENDED_SECURITY is already
implemented in TNG?

luke





More information about the samba-technical mailing list