More utmp stuff
Jeremy Allison
jeremy at valinux.com
Fri Mar 24 19:50:29 GMT 2000
David Lee wrote:
>
> Some points:
>
> o The utmp functionality seems to be proving popular. So we ought to
> continue to improve it and port it.
Agreed - it does seem something that many people want.
> o The sheer variety of utmp implementations means that porting is
> becoming increasingly non-trivial.
This is an understatement :-).
> o We need to pare down to the absolute minimum the work needed by the
> central Samba team to handle this can'o'worms. My guess is that
> they want to keep out of the gory details of implementation, but
> nevertheless keep a managerial eye over the process.
Thankyou ! Yes - this is *exactly* right !
> o Samba 2.0.7pre2 (not pre1) is the base to work from.
>
> o I would strongly urge that this base be augmented by a patch I sent to
> Jeremy a few weeks ago (since re-sent) which makes a better attempt at
> getting the default pathnames.
Ok - I will get this into the codebase asap.
> o We should strongly consider moving the code out of "smbd/connection.c"
> into a separate file, because the code will, of necessity, become
> increasingly littered with "#ifdef MY-LITTLE-OS" constructions
> (somewhat akin to "smbd/quotas.c").
This won't happen for 2.0.7 - that would be too much of a change at
this late stage. I will target this for 2.0.8 and above.
> Does that all sound reasonable?
Very.
> Jeremy:
>
> o Do you approve the above?
Yes.
> o Could you consider separating out the code from connection.c in
> whatever way you see best? Either with or without my patch, I don't
> mind. There'll be knock-on effects on Makefiles etc. to be done.
As above - expect this for 2.0.8.
> o Those of us who are interested can then use this as a base for
> development and porting. This should be entirely self-contained in the
> new "utmp.c" file (with minimum necessary "configure.in", "loadparm.c"
> changes), as outlined above. OK?
>
> o Could you nominate someone to coordinate the nitty-gritty work?
You seem to be the interested party :-). I'm all for self
selection in these things.
Thanks for all your help on this,
Jeremy.
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Buying an operating system without source is like buying
a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.
--------------------------------------------------------
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list