[samba-tng] spoolss conversion is complete!
Jean Francois Micouleau
Jean-Francois.Micouleau at dalalu.fr
Sat Jan 29 00:23:56 GMT 2000
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> 1) it's so that other people can write alternative implementations
> (including me!) _without_ having to worry about marshalling and
> unmarshalling. why should they???
I don't know anybody willing to rewrite code when it's already available
for free with the source.
> 2) we can replace the marshalling code with auto-generated code.
Err! we could already. The parsing code is separated from server/client
code since at least Nov. 97.
> 3) it's possible to write stubs like this, for use as dynamic-runtime
if it's just for stub why didn't you renamed samr_open() to _samr_open()
and created a stub samr_open() ?
> you get the idea?
More information about the samba-technical