take on future events
davecb at Canada.Sun.COM
Mon Feb 1 14:51:02 GMT 1999
Greg Dickie wrote:
> > I was operating under the assumption that we'd be replicating for stability,
> > not for load distribution. In that case only one server would be updating
> > at a given time.
We could look at it in two ways:
1) hot fail-over, done with a private replication
scheme between servers, and
2) multiple wins servers, which would need incremental
The former is easy: file transfer would suffice.
The latter needs a protocol designbed.
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify some people
185 Ellerslie Ave., | and astonish the rest. -- Mark Twain
Willowdale, Ontario | http://java.science.yorku.ca/~davecb
Work: (905) 477-0437 Home: (416) 223-8968 Email: davecb at canada.sun.com
More information about the samba-technical