samba-ntdom needed any more?

[Anders C. Thorsen]

I agree. Much of the discussions the last 12 months on samba-ntdom
has been either discussions that fit better in samba at samba.org
or samba-technical at samba.org

--Anders

On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:12:03AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2001 14:53:11 Craig Kelley wrote:
> > 
> > Do we even need this list anymore?  If the ntdom stuff 
> > has gone to the main branch, then there isn't really a
> >  need for an 'ntdom' discussion list, unless we want
> > specific traffic to come here.  (But I don't
> > see a samba-printing or samba-time list either)
> > 
> > Just curious.
> 
> I have been wondering about this as well for a few weeks.
> In fact, I thinking posting administration of stable Samba PDC
> on samba at samba.org would provide for less redundancy.
> 
> I just checked on membership.  samba-ntdom has about 2,300
> members (~600 of these are digested).  Samba at samba.org has about 
> 4,300 (~3000 are digested).
> 
> What do people say?  Has this list provided it purposes and
> should be merged back in samba at samba.org?  I would personally 
> love one less mailing list to read. :-)  And it has been a little
> less than one topic recently.
> 
> You folks decide.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers, jerry
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    /\  Gerald (Jerry) Carter                     Professional Services
>  \/    http://www.valinux.com/  VA Linux Systems   gcarter at valinux.com
>        http://www.samba.org/       SAMBA Team          jerry at samba.org
>        http://www.plainjoe.org/                     jerry at plainjoe.org
> 
>        "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
>                                 - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
> 

-- 

--Anders

----------------------------------------
Only two things are infinite.
The universe and human stupidity.
Although, I am unsure of the former.

Albert Einstein