Following LDAP referrals?

[Chris Garrigues]

I've patched my local copy, and I'd like to request this change to the source 
tree.

Thanks,
Chris

> From:  Phil Mayers <p.mayers at ic.ac.uk>
> Date:    Thu, 4 May 2000 08:43:59 +1000
>
> I looked at the code a while back - changing the search level ought not
> to make any difference.
>
> Chris Garrigues wrote:
> > 
> > Is there a good reason for using LDAP_SCOPE_ONELEVEL or can this be
> > changed to LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE.


-- 
Chris Garrigues                 virCIO
http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/	http://www.virCIO.Com
+1 512 432 4046                 +1 512 374 0500
				4314 Avenue C
O-				Austin, TX  78751-3709
                                

  My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination.  For an
  explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html 

    Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft,
      but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 239 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20000504/a4548b1c/attachment.bin