Fwd: Re: NetLogon Service
Brian Keats
bkeats at spiff.chin.gc.ca
Mon Mar 6 03:56:12 GMT 2000
Sorry Matt, I do have domain logons = yes ...
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Matthew Geddes wrote:
> Brian Keats wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 03 Mar 2000, Kevin Colby wrote:
> > > Brian Keats wrote:
> > > >
> > > > (Did I mention I'm using secuity = domain ?)
> > >
> > > I do not understand what you are trying to do here.
> > > Is this a PDC, BDC, or a domain member?
> > >
> > > - Kevin Colby
> > > kevinc at grainsystems.com
> >
> > It's a domain member. I'm trying to get it to act as a, for the lack of a
> > better term, kind of proxy DOMAIN controller. It's almost doing that now
> > except for the part of passing along the logon script to the client machine.
> > In other words, the linux machine is validating users by contacting the PDC (
> > or one of the BDC's).
>
> I don't see how it can be physically possible. I was under the
> impression that if you have security=domain and no domain logons=yes
> line in your smb.conf file, you are rnuning a member server. It will not
> process any logons. Once you add the security=user and domain
> logons=yes, you are no longer a member, but a domain controller. If you
> join a domain, you are a Backup Domain Controller. Someone else will
> know for sure.
>
> At least you don't need to reinstall your unix to go from PDC -> BDC ->
> Member server. ;-).
>
> Matt
>
> --
> "Our goal for the next release of Windows 2000 is to have zero bugs."
> - Lucovsky, Microsoft
>
More information about the samba-ntdom
mailing list