Password sync

[Chris Garrigues]

> From:  Jeremy Allison <jeremy at valinux.com>
> Date:    Thu, 20 Jul 2000 04:05:42 +1000
>
> The second problem is not the NT password hash but the
> legacy lanman hash which is usually stored with the
> more secure NT hash.
> 
> The lanman hash *is* trivial and brute forcible, and
> this makes the security of the NT hash irrelevent, as
> you only need to brute force the lanman one.

So, if I took the lmpassword entry out of my ldap database, what would no 
longer work?

Chris

-- 
Chris Garrigues                 http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
virCIO                          http://www.virCIO.Com
4314 Avenue C                   
Austin, TX  78751-3709		+1 512 374 0500

  My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination.  For an
  explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html 

    Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft,
      but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 239 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20000719/86d241c0/attachment.bin