cwg-samba-ntdom at DeepEddy.Com
Wed Jul 19 23:20:05 GMT 2000
> From: Jeremy Allison <jeremy at valinux.com>
> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 04:05:42 +1000
> The second problem is not the NT password hash but the
> legacy lanman hash which is usually stored with the
> more secure NT hash.
> The lanman hash *is* trivial and brute forcible, and
> this makes the security of the NT hash irrelevent, as
> you only need to brute force the lanman one.
So, if I took the lmpassword entry out of my ldap database, what would no
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
4314 Avenue C
Austin, TX 78751-3709 +1 512 374 0500
My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination. For an
explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html
Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft,
but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 239 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20000719/86d241c0/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-ntdom