FW: SYSKEY2. Request For Comments

[geoffrey lee]

hi,

but what will be exactly the use of this new feature? i think that luke has
yet to explain that to everyone.

right now, all i have seen is arguments as to whether it should be
implemented or not, but not _why_ it should be there, well, no solid reasons
anyway.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba-ntdom at samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom at samba.org]On Behalf Of
> Gerald W. Carter
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 11:10 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM
> Subject: Re: FW: SYSKEY2. Request For Comments
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Sander Striker wrote:
>
> > >Do you remember the BRANCH_NTDOM code from '97 - '98?
> >
> > No, sorry, I wasn't anywhere near Samba back then. What happened to
> > it? (I'm hoping that you don't reply with: 'it went into design
> deadlock'
> > :-))
> >
>
> It is dead because the merge between that and the head branch was too
> horrible.  That's what Jeremy is afraid will happen here.
>
>
>
>
>
> jerry
> ________________________________________________________________________
>                             Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter
> Engineering Network Services                           Auburn University
> jerry at eng.auburn.edu             http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw
>
>        "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
>                                   - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
>