Speeding up rsync

hancooper hancooper at protonmail.com
Tue Aug 24 21:24:09 UTC 2021


‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 9:12 PM, hancooper via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote:

> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 8:25 PM, Kevin Korb via rsync rsync at lists.samba.org wrote:
>
> > In my experience backing up multiple hosts to a single host can speed
> > things up. Especially if using rsync over ssh with multiple CPUs on the
> > single host. You would need to do some experimentation to determine the
> > best number for your hardware and network. Also, if you exceed that
> > number you can put more stress on the backup machine lessening the
> > impact to the hosts being backed up.
> > On 8/24/21 3:58 PM, hancooper via rsync wrote:
> >
> > > It makes sense to we to run multiple rsync commands to speed up a backup.
> > > At work, some have argued that if I sync the data all to the same host,
> > > there is no advantage
> > > in parallelization.   Whether you sync 3x 1G in parallel or 1x 3G makes
> > > no noticeable difference.
> > > Speed in general does not increase by increasing the number of sync
> > > processes.
> > > However, if one want to sync to multiple hosts, the effort may be
> > > worthwhile.
> > > What is the current advice about speeding up data transfer ?
> >
> > --
> > Kevin Korb Phone: (407) 252-6853
>
> Hi Kevin. What about a single host to another with multiple CPU's ?


rsync really needs a lot of CPU power.  It is not so much disk-bound
(as many conclude against using multiple processes), but cpu-bound.






More information about the rsync mailing list