hvjunk at gmail.com
Mon Jan 28 02:22:24 MST 2013
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:07 AM, <devzero at web.de> wrote:
> Isn`t RsyncSSL (wrap rsync with stunnel via stdin/out) the better solution
> ? (as it is using a mature external program for the SSL stuff)
Why SSL when you already have a proper working SSH with certificates etc.
that should be as good if not better?
The only place that an SSL would make some sense, is if you are going to do
it to/from an rsync daemon, but then how would that be "better" than a
ssh-only account with keys/etc. only allowing the rsync to execute?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rsync