chuckw at quantumlinux.com
Tue May 17 13:33:46 MDT 2011
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 10:54 -0700, Chuck Wolber wrote:
> > Abstracting the core functionality into a librsync.so would be really
> > spiffy too...
> All easy to say, harder to do (and maintain). I'm thankful that rsync
> meets my needs right now, and that Wayne has gotten as many bugs out of
> it as he has over the last few years.
Agreed. I mostly meant that as tongue-in-cheek. Creating librsync.so seems
about as hard (or harder) as multi-threading.
"An idea does not gain truth as it gains followers." Amanda Bloom
More information about the rsync