matt at mattmccutchen.net
Tue May 17 13:29:44 MDT 2011
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 10:54 -0700, Chuck Wolber wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2011, CACook at quantum-sci.com wrote:
> > In researching this I find that a change to multi-threaded goodness
> > would require a massive rewrite, and would only be considered for an
> > rsync replacement.
> Abstracting the core functionality into a librsync.so would be really
> spiffy too...
All easy to say, harder to do (and maintain). I'm thankful that rsync
meets my needs right now, and that Wayne has gotten as many bugs out of
it as he has over the last few years.
More information about the rsync