rsync as a deliberately slow copy?
paul+rsync at wurtel.net
Thu Sep 30 04:47:57 MDT 2010
On Thu 30 Sep 2010, Henri Shustak wrote:
> Yes SSH (depending upon the system) may be resource intensive. As such, the suggestion of using nice is a really good suggestion!
Also, if running on linux, investigate ionice.
This, given CFQ disk scheduling (the default in recent kernels, I
believe) will cause rsync to play nice with IO resources, whereas "nice"
handles CPU load. rsync is often much more IO intensive than CPU bound.
I often run rsync with 'ionice -c3 rsync ....'
More information about the rsync