Rsync 4TB datafiles...?
lsk
ellsatish at gmail.com
Tue Mar 21 18:50:48 GMT 2006
> Also rsync gurus would you suggest which is the fastest way to trasfer this
> 4 TB data ? Any suggestions...would be of great help.
I'd recommend doing --inplace, as chances are that data won't move
within a file with oracle data files (so it's not useful to try to find
moved data), and copying the 4TB to temp. files every time could become
a big timewaster. Also the -t option could be handy, not all files
change all the time IIRC.
////***lsk
I can't use -t because the oracle datafiles header information are constanly
updated so it will definetely change.
But I have tried various options including --inplace,--no-whole-file etc.,
for last few weeks but all the results show me removing the destination
server oracle datafiles and after that doing an "rsync -vz" from source is
faster than copying(rsyncing) over the old files that are present in
destination.
I put list of rsync file commands in a batch file and spawn them so that
they run in background.
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-4TB-datafiles...--t1318624.html#a3518597
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at Nabble.com.
More information about the rsync
mailing list