[PATCH] Inplace option for rsync
mark at wunit.net
Wed Apr 28 00:10:07 GMT 2004
I knew that keep_partial didn't make sense with inplace, but hadn't
spent much time understanding that section of the code (took me long
enough to get my head around sender, receiver and match), so I made what
looked like the right change at the time. ;-)
Wayne Davison wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 08:38:41AM +1000, Mark Curtis wrote:
>>I have written a 'smallish' patch to implement the --inplace option
>Looks very promising. I've tweaked it just a bit and committed it in
>the patches dir in CVS.
>Q: was there a reason you were waiting to reset the keep_partial flag
>until server_options()? I thought it would be better to reset it (when
>inplace was specified) in parse_arguments().
>I haven't tried to test it or examine it in any great detail yet.
More information about the rsync