Does block level replication require local disk access (Block lev el) or can it work with a network share too

[Jan-Benedict Glaw]

On Wed, 2003-07-23 13:20:12 -0700, jw schultz <jw at pegasys.ws>
wrote in message <20030723202012.GA16150 at pegasys.ws>:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:10:22PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-07-23 14:18:41 +0100, Antony Parkin <AntonyP at bluearc.com>
> > wrote in message <35265C2E6404DE45ABFA7C15EB0CFB1B19226E at ukexchange.terastack.bluearc.com>:

> It is very unlikely he has any choice in the matter.  In
> many cases it is added by an upstream MTA.  Even if it isn't
> some companies have a blanket policy (leave it to
> management) requiring the stupidity.  

Which doesn't forbid to look for some "better" email service provider.
You can even get those for free[1], but whom do I tell:-?

> Why don't you do as the notice requested and send your
> complaint to sysadmin at bluearc.com

Guess what I'll do:)

MfG, JBG
[1]: Beer, not speech.

-- 
   Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw at lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481
   "Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
    fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!
      ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(IRAQ_WAR_2 | DRM | TCPA));
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20030723/31cfc72b/attachment.bin