Does block level replication require local disk access (Block lev el) or can it work with a network share too

[jw schultz]

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:10:22PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-07-23 14:18:41 +0100, Antony Parkin <AntonyP at bluearc.com>
> wrote in message <35265C2E6404DE45ABFA7C15EB0CFB1B19226E at ukexchange.terastack.bluearc.com>:
> > *********************************************************************
> > This e-mail and any attachment is confidential. It may only be read, copied and used by the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), you may not copy, use, distribute, forward, store or disclose this e-mail or any attachment. If you are not the intended recipient(s) or have otherwise received this e-mail in error, you should destroy it and any attachment and notify the sender by reply e-mail or send a message to sysadmin at bluearc.com
> > *********************************************************************
> 
> Please do *never ever* send something like that to a public mailing
> list.

It is very unlikely he has any choice in the matter.  In
many cases it is added by an upstream MTA.  Even if it isn't
some companies have a blanket policy (leave it to
management) requiring the stupidity.  

Why don't you do as the notice requested and send your
complaint to sysadmin at bluearc.com

-- 
________________________________________________________________
	J.W. Schultz            Pegasystems Technologies
	email address:		jw at pegasys.ws

		Remember Cernan and Schmitt