[clug] OT: Solar power recommendations and advice
felix.karpfen at gmail.com
felix.karpfen at gmail.com
Tue Apr 20 02:22:29 MDT 2010
On Apr 20, 2010 9:47am, Peter Barker <pbarker at barker.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Felix Karpfen wrote:
> I would be interested in your reasoning there. Domestically generated
> power from solar *should* reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and the more
> widespread the better. Whether it's the best use of that money is another
> matter.
My understanding/conclusions are the following:
The main problem with electricity (AC current) is that it cannot be stored.
This holds true both for solar panels (after conversion to AC) and for
power-stations. Power stations that are based on hydro-electric power can
just use their unwanted electricity to pump water uphill, back into the
reservoir. Other power stations (and domestic producers) hook up to a grid
and hope that someone, somewhere will use that electricity and pay for it.
When electricity production from non-fossil-fuels becomes sufficiently high
(and price-competitive) the demand for conventional-power-station-generated
electricity will drop;. Until such electricity generation reaches a point
at which commercial (fossil-fuel) producers are forced to shut down some of
their generators - part-time or totally - the greenhouse gases that they
pump into the atmosphere will not get any less.
I am not wedded to this analysis; if I have missed a vital ingredient, I am
ready to change my tune.
Felix Karpfen
PS: I wrote the above reply because the posting was sent to my mailbox.
Before mailing the reply, I checked the CLUG list; and appear to have
generated a great many other comments. I do not consider that I have the
needed knowledge to reply to them and say anything sensible that is not
also self-evident.
More information about the linux
mailing list