[clug] Re: Slackware session: was Debian session for any Choobs?
Nathan O'Sullivan
nathan.osullivan at team.mammoth.com.au
Wed Jul 1 01:13:42 GMT 2009
+1 my distribution is better than yours flame war
I thought we were past this?
Adam Jenkins wrote:
>
>> Full Metal Gerbil? Ubuntu "is all about updates" but Slackware is better >because they don't update? What do you do for security issues?
>>
>
> http://www.slackware.com/security/list.php?l=slackware-security&y=2009
> Slackware don't update for the sake of updating.. It's only for good reason (i.e. stability/security).
>
>
>> I think this guy is suffering "second girlfriend syndrome" and doesn't >realise it (ie: your new girlfriend is better because *you* are better).
>>
>
> Er what? I don't understand your analogy.
> Ubuntu seems to have acquired the reputation of being almost as hardcore (+1 geek factor) as Debian, only shinier and with free media. Otherwise it suffers from bad design, which anyone who has used a semi-decent stable OS like Slackware, or a commercial desktop OS like Fedora/SuSE would realise straight away.
> But Ubuntu is good for people who are new to Linux, and the LiveCD thing is cool, except that almost every other distro has it now too.
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>
More information about the linux
mailing list