sunnzy at gmail.com
Fri May 25 07:24:31 GMT 2007
Sorry if this is a bit off topic, but I could not resist to ask...
Is this really the printed copy of OOXML specification:
2007/5/24, MC <crash at michaelcarden.net>:
> On Tuesday 22 May 2007 20:37, jim wrote:
> > Does anyone know what is happening similar to described here (item of
> > sat 19 May)?
> > http://blog.janik.cz/
> A couple of months back I spent an afternoon with a techy guy from Redmond who
> was out here promoting the technical awesomeness of ooxml. I didn't envy him
> the task. Apparently they run a five day course on it for software developers
> and we tried to cram the same content into half a day. I'll happily discuss
> it at a clug meeting with anyone who cares.
> > I am wondering where things are handled locally about this?
> Standards Australia looks after Australia's response to the ecma/ms proposal
> and lodged Australia's initial objections at the start of this year. They
> sought and received input from all manner of interested groups around
> I'm not sure what their position is right now though.
> linux mailing list
> linux at lists.samba.org
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
More information about the linux