[clug] Runlevel 5 vs 3 and startx
Arafangion
thestar at fussycoder.id.au
Thu Nov 24 06:51:22 GMT 2005
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 06:34 pm, Mr B wrote:
> Out of curiosity, I did some (very rudimentary) tests a while ago were
> I logged on remotely and measured loads on the system in various
> states. One of the things I noticed was when the system was just
> sitting at the (default) gdm login screen it used almost no more
> CPU/Memory power than if I was in RL 3.
>
> It was a different story once X started and a lot of crap started
> chewing resources. Now if it's something I can do in text mode I just
> Ctrl+Atl+F1 and log in on a text window, but the graphical display is
> there if I need it (seemingly) without the overhead. Also noticed
> that it unloaded everything when I logged out and went back to the
> login screen. Was just wondering if there is another reason to not
> leave it on the login screen or if it's just a hangup from the old
> days?
>
> Jade
All the distinction between runlevels lie in the fact that when you use a
computer, it generally has a task - you want to use it as a graphical
workstation? Use runlevel 5. You want to use it as a console system, use
runlevel 3. You want to run it in single-user mode, I believe that's runlevel
2.
The different runlevels merely run different scripts.
More information about the linux
mailing list