[clug] Runlevel 5 vs 3 and startx
Michael.James at csiro.au
Thu Nov 24 01:16:14 GMT 2005
For a desktop machine, set the runlevel to 5 and log in graphically.
For a server, I've always set the runlevel to 3,
logged on in plain text, then used startx because I want graphics.
(Even if only to have 2 terminals side by side.)
Now SuSE's permissions.secure takes the SUID bit
off /usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg thereby breaking startx
for all but privileged users.
When I complained the maintainer said startx is obsolete.
Am I just being old-fashioned keeping my servers at runlevel 3?
Is there no real resource penalty to having them at 5 all the time?
(If it's just a bit of inactive RAM, it'll soon be swapped out.)
Logging on locally is rare but sometimes I do it
for convenience or to configure network interfaces.
Just to do what startx used to do I now have to log on (text) as root,
up the runlevel to 5, log on again, do the work,
su to root and finally init back to 3. What a pain.
Anyone know what the security problem with Xorg is
that led to removing the SUID bit?
Anyone know a wrapper that could make it safer?
Michael James michael.james at csiro.au
System Administrator voice: 02 6246 5040
CSIRO Bioinformatics Facility fax: 02 6246 5166
No matter how much you pay for software,
you always get less than you hoped.
Unless you pay nothing, then you get more.
More information about the linux