[clug] Re: Linux max memory per process

[Pearl Louis]

All fixed now.  Thanks to people who pointed out the "filter" option I
stupidly missed on my scan of the gmail page.

I'd like to blame this on the fact that I just had to delete 18 copies
of "Antispam UOL" using gmail's multi-step method of deleting messages
and was overwhelmed with rage.  OK, severe annoyance.


Pearl

On 17/11/05, Pearl Louis <pearl.louis at gmail.com> wrote:
> On a related note, is it possible to ban email addresses?
>
> petsupermarket at uol.com.br
>
> Just sent me a dozen emails is relation to my original post.  Looks
> like a spammer.  Well, either an extremely badly set up
> challenge-response system or a phisher or virus disguised as a very
> badly set up challenge-response system.  And after the whole "viruses
> disguised as automatic responses from anti-virus systems" thing,
> there's no way in hell I'm following the instructions on the emails
> from an unfamiliar email address.
>
> Or at least does anyone know how to ban email addresses using gmail?
>
> Pearl
>
> On 17/11/05, Pearl Louis <pearl.louis at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi guys
> >
> > Just a quick question.  What is the maximum memory per process that
> > you can have in Linux, both on 32-bit machines and 64-bit machines and
> > for both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels?  Also, this limit includes both physical
> > RAM and virtual memory right?
> >
> > Thanks very much!
> > Pearl
> >
>