FW: [clug] SSH attack

Tony and Robyn Lewis beakysnugger at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Jul 26 12:37:12 GMT 2005


For list posterity, Steve's reply (when I replied, I forgot to include 
the clug address)

Tony

Steve Walsh wrote:

>This page explains it best
>
>http://www.stanford.edu/group/itss-ccs/security/unix/tcpwrappers.html
>  
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tony and Robyn Lewis [mailto:beakysnugger at yahoo.co.uk]
>Sent: Tuesday, 26 July 2005 4:31 PM
>To: steve at nerdvana.org.au
>Subject: Re: FW: [clug] SSH attack
>
>
>Steve Walsh wrote:
>
>  
>
>>but then if a machine is on
>>the big bad net and not running TCP wrapper ...I don't want to thing about
>>that.
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>I'll bite.
>
>I know TCP wrappers is good for limiting hosts, and limiting services.  
>Sounds like a well-tuned firewall will do this but better.
>
>Apart from redundancy (in case you bork your firewall), what does TCP 
>wrappers give you?
>
>Tony
>
>
>
>  
>



More information about the linux mailing list