FW: [clug] SSH attack
Tony and Robyn Lewis
beakysnugger at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Jul 26 12:37:12 GMT 2005
For list posterity, Steve's reply (when I replied, I forgot to include
the clug address)
Tony
Steve Walsh wrote:
>This page explains it best
>
>http://www.stanford.edu/group/itss-ccs/security/unix/tcpwrappers.html
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tony and Robyn Lewis [mailto:beakysnugger at yahoo.co.uk]
>Sent: Tuesday, 26 July 2005 4:31 PM
>To: steve at nerdvana.org.au
>Subject: Re: FW: [clug] SSH attack
>
>
>Steve Walsh wrote:
>
>
>
>>but then if a machine is on
>>the big bad net and not running TCP wrapper ...I don't want to thing about
>>that.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>I'll bite.
>
>I know TCP wrappers is good for limiting hosts, and limiting services.
>Sounds like a well-tuned firewall will do this but better.
>
>Apart from redundancy (in case you bork your firewall), what does TCP
>wrappers give you?
>
>Tony
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the linux
mailing list