[clug] spam attacker

[Francis James Whittle]

Don't you mean "pwn3d"?

No, electronic vigilante behaviour has been proven in the past to be
completely pointless.

Cheers,
	Francis

On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 10:23 +1000, Alex Satrapa wrote:
>   - How do you know that the sites being attacked are owned by
>     spammers? What if the sites have been "owned", and you're
>     costing someone money because they didn't properly secure
>     their servers? Isn't it polite to let them know that their
>     server is broken before attacking them?