matt at mh.dropbear.id.au
Wed Mar 19 13:37:49 EST 2003
Michael Still (mikal at stillhq.com) wrote:
> Ummm. Wouldn't that be illegal?
I think so. I'm fairly certain that Sun keep the
no-distribution-unless-licensed-to-do-so clause on all their licenses
(even the so-called free version of Solaris)
I don't have a copy handy though to double-check, so TTWAGOS :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux/attachments/20030319/0bc79795/attachment.bin
More information about the linux