Q: Comparison of Fast Ethernet Devices?
Alex Satrapa
grail at goldweb.com.au
Mon Jul 8 13:33:07 EST 2002
Does anyone know where I could find a comparison of the performance of
fast ethernet devices?
I know it's probably being nit-picky, but I want to see some
measurements of the performance of various consumer 100Mbps NICs,
indicating such things as wire-to-memory latency, maximum sustained
throughput, processor loading and perhaps heat dissipation.
This exercise in useless numbers is mainly because I have a P166 router
for my ADSL connection, and I want to see what I can possibly do to
reduce the latency across that router, and heat generated by its
components. Sure, using an Intel Etherexpress Pro/100 versus a Realtek
8129 might only reduce the latency from 10ms to 8ms (numbers pulled out
of thin air) - but I'd like to reduce processor load too - mainly
because I don't want any fans inside the case. This box is going to be
in my bedroom due to proximity of power and phone sockets, in a rental
property. I don't want my internet connection making me deaf in my
sleep. I also want to replicate this setup for a friend who has their
dial-up box in the linen cupboard, near their bedrooms.
Of course, taking financial aspects into consideration (ie: I'm stone
broke), I'll probably end up just getting a couple of DFE-530TX cards
from Page Data Systems in Fyshwick - The DFE-530TX is based on the VIA
Rhine chipset, I've read:
> OK, first off , is it a DFE-530TX or a DFE530TX+? These are _not_ the
> same cards. If the + one is based on the Realtek 8139 chipset, the 530TX
> is based on the Via Rhine chip (and just to confuse things even more,
> newer 530TX boards have a Via Rhine 2 chips on them).
-- http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/2001/debian-
alpha-200110/msg00113.html
I read it on the Internet, it must be true ;) More stories to support
the DFE-530TX(+) claim:
- http://hints.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/old/D-Link-DFE-530TX+.txt
-
http://etherboot.sourceforge.net/db/nics.php?show=tech_data&vendor=D-Link
Any pointers to worth that's already been done on performance
comparisons?
Thanks
Alex
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 225 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux/attachments/20020708/3c8c5df8/attachment.bin
More information about the linux
mailing list