[jcifs] ntlmv2 vs ActiveDirectory

[Caldarale, Charles R]

> From: jcifs-bounces at lists.samba.org
> [mailto:jcifs-bounces at lists.samba.org]
> On Behalf Of oxidm at centrum.sk
> Subject: [jcifs] ntlmv2 vs ActiveDirectory
> 
> We've come across jCifs but according to some infos, jCifs does 
> not support NTLMv2 (only v1) against Domain Controller because 
> of a way of computing required hash (NTLMv2 computes hash with 
> the address of called server).

You may well be confusing the old HTTP filter kludge that was tacked onto jCIFS with real jCIFS operation.  Read the FAQ for details:

http://jcifs.samba.org/FAQ.html

 - Chuck


THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.