[jcifs] ntlmv2 vs ActiveDirectory
Caldarale, Charles R
Chuck.Caldarale at unisys.com
Fri May 28 17:14:08 MDT 2010
> From: jcifs-bounces at lists.samba.org
> [mailto:jcifs-bounces at lists.samba.org]
> On Behalf Of oxidm at centrum.sk
> Subject: [jcifs] ntlmv2 vs ActiveDirectory
> We've come across jCifs but according to some infos, jCifs does
> not support NTLMv2 (only v1) against Domain Controller because
> of a way of computing required hash (NTLMv2 computes hash with
> the address of called server).
You may well be confusing the old HTTP filter kludge that was tacked onto jCIFS with real jCIFS operation. Read the FAQ for details:
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
More information about the jCIFS