[jcifs] jCIFS API issue with a dual layer DFS

Michael B Allen ioplex at gmail.com
Fri Jun 18 10:07:25 MDT 2010


Hi Marina,

Please send all replies (except those with packet captures or
sensitive data) to the JCIFS mailing list.

There are currently 38 items on the JCIFS TODO list but many of those
are insignificant compared to the type of issue you are reporting
(assuming it is a real issue). Some issues have been on the TODO list
for many years. I don't have much Free time anymore.

Mike

-- 
Michael B Allen
Java Active Directory Integration
http://www.ioplex.com/


On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Marina <marusya1004 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Michael,
> I was also wondering how big your TO DO LIST is. Is there a chance to see
> your team's conclusion in the nearest future?
>
> Thank you,
> Marianna
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Marina <marusya1004 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Good Morning Michael,
>>
>> Thank you again for taking the time to review our problem.
>> I hope you will share your test results and possible solution with me :-)
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Marianna D.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Michael B Allen <ioplex at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Marina,
>>>
>>> JCIFS supports unlimited levels of DFS indirection although more than
>>> one level is not tested regularly.
>>>
>>> I have added an entry to the TODO list to test multiple levels of
>>> redirection and referenced your mixed domain-based + stand-alone
>>> use-case.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael B Allen
>>> Java Active Directory Integration
>>> http://www.ioplex.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Marina <marusya1004 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > We are experiencing a problem with jCIFS API when our folder structure
>>> > is
>>> > set up with dual layer DFS. The API doesn't resolve the second layer of
>>> > linked references to a physical location (see example below).
>>> >
>>> > The single layer DFS works fine and the target physical location is
>>> > properly
>>> > resolved (see example below).
>>> >
>>> >  Please note our application is only expected to perform in MS Windows
>>> > environment.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >  Does the new version of JCIFS (jcifs-1.3.13) support dual layer DFS?
>>> >
>>> >  Or are there any plans to support that in the future versions?
>>> >
>>> >  Alternatively, if dual layer DFS support is not planned for JCIFS
>>> > could you
>>> >       recommend another reliable API?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >  Supported (Single Layer DFS)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >  DFS Root > DFSLink1 > Target Server
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >  \\domain.com\dfsroot\
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >          \\domain.com\dfsroot\dfslink1
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >                  \\domain.com\dfsroot\dfslink1\fileserver
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >  Not Supported (Dual Layer DFS)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >  DFS Root > DFSLink3 > DFSLink1 > Target Server
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >  \\domain.com\dfsroot\
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >          \\domain.com\dfsroot\dfslink3
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >                  \\domain.com\dfsroot\dfslink1
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >                          \\domain.com\dfsroot\dfslink1\fileserver
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Sincerely,
>>> > Marianna D.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Marina D.
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Marina D.
>


More information about the jCIFS mailing list