[jcifs] NTLMv2 and jCIFS

Jay Kraly jaykraly at gmail.com
Mon Mar 17 03:23:34 GMT 2008


To clarify my configuration, I was also not able to leave my registry
setting at 0x20000030 because of security policy.  I tested it out on my
computer prior to implementing the hack to set the NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2
flag to true.  Once I confirmed that the registry setting fixed the problem,
I put it back to 0x20080030 and lmCompatibility to 4.  Then I tried the hack
and found that it "fixed" the problem and allowed IE to authenticate.  So
there must be something else server side on your end that is still blocking
the password.

The other avenue I have been testing is a commercial jcifs extension from
Oakland Software that claims to support NTLMv2 authentication.  However, I
found that authentication did not get any further than the vanilla jcifs.
Their support people told me that if the domain controller has SMB signing
enabled their product (and jcifs) will not work.  You may want to check for
that setting on the servers.

-J

On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:59 AM, AsafM <asaf.mesika at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've been experiencing some difficulties with point no. 3. I have a JBoss
> with the jCIFS filter installed. (version 1.2.18). Scenerio 1: working 1.
> NtlmMinClientSec and NtlmMinServerSec are both set to 0x0. 2. jCIFS
> lmCompatibility is set to 0. Everything is working out fine. Scenrio 2: Not
> working (typical desktop in a customer organization) 1. NtlmMinClientSec and
> NtlmMinServerSec are both set to 0x20080030. 2. jCIFS lmCompatibility is set
> to 0. IE doens't send type-3 message. I've managed to bypass that, by
> modifying the type-2 message jCIFS is sending (setting the
> NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2 flag to true). The returned type-3 message has both
> LM and NTLM hash at length of 24, indicating a NTLM v1 response. Still, from
> some reason, the authentication fails at the DC level (
> jcifs.smb.SmbAuthException: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad
> password.) How can this be solved, since it is obvious that the client is
> sending a normal NTLM response. Thanks, Asaf Mesika
>
> Eric Glass wrote:
>  There are some specific scenarios where LMv2 will not work properly; from
> what I remember: 1) signing will not work if authentication is done with a
> given account to a host in a different domain (i.e. user is "DOMAINA\user"
> and computer is in DOMAINB). 2) There are issues if you are authenticating
> against a server that is configured with the "nolmhash" registry key (it
> apparently will not pass the LM response through properly, even though the
> LM hash is technically not used in the LMv2 response). 3) There can be
> issues related to the NtlmMinClientSec/NtlmMinServerSec registry settings
> (not necessarily limited to LMv2). I had done some related work that I keep
> meaning to backport in to jCIFS; as Vista apparently uses NTLMv2/LMv2 by
> default this may become a more common issue anyway. In the meantime, if the
> server/DC requires LMCompatibility >= 3 and jCIFS isn't working you might
> need to give the specific error messages etc. to diagnose. Eric On 12/6/06,
> Adis Katkic wrote: > > Hi > > I have a problem with jCIFS and NTLMv2. > I
> was reading on many places on the Internet about this but I'm still not >
> sure if I should give up. > What I come up to is: > > 1. jCIFS can handle
> LMv2 which is some kind if NTLMv2 but diffirent length > of blob or somthing
> like that. > > 2. This means that jCIFS may be used with NTLMv2 if server
> uses Pass Trough > Authenication? > Am I right here? > > 3. lmCompability
> for NtlmHttpFilter must be set to 3. > > However I tried to make it work but
> it just wouldn't work. I'm not sure if > my AD uses Pass trough
> authentication but I suspect it doesn't. > I can log in from different
> domain than server domain and if I understood > well it does not work with
> Pass trough. > > Any ides how to proceed? Is there some other component out
> there that could > help me? > I found code that Konstantin Kasatkin wrote
> but I don't know how to use it. > How about JNDI, is there some components
> that use JNDI to login via Active > Directory. > In my opinion documetation
> about this issue is quite little. > > I'm thankfull for any kind of help. >
> Adis Katkic > ________________________________ > Express yourself instantly
> with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger Download today > it's FREE!
>
>
> ------------------------------
> View this message in context: Re: NTLMv2 and jCIFS<http://www.nabble.com/NTLMv2-and-jCIFS-tp7720803p16077710.html>
> Sent from the Samba - jcifs mailing list archive<http://www.nabble.com/Samba---jcifs-f13153.html>at
> Nabble.com.
>
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed


More information about the jcifs mailing list