[jcifs] no chance to run jcifs_0.7.0b7

[Allen, Michael B (RSCH)]

Agreed. Will do.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Matthew Tippett [SMTP:matthew at casero.com]
> Sent:	Monday, November 11, 2002 3:56 PM
> Cc:	jcifs at samba.org
> Subject:	Re: [jcifs] no chance to run jcifs_0.7.0b7
> 
> Instead of making this a FAQ, we can detect it at runtime
> 
> See
> 
> http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/applet/practical/properties.html
> 
> in particular the java.version System property.  In which case we can 
> throw a runtime exception or similar.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Matthew
> 
> Michael B. Allen wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 12:56:04 +0100
> > andrea.lanza at frameweb.it wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>then I followed debugging the source of jcifs.smb.Handler.: I reached
> again
> >>the last line
> >>
> >> setURL( u, "smb://", u.getHost(), getDefaultPort(),
> >>                    u.getAuthority(), u.getUserInfo(),
> >>                    u.getPath(), u.getQuery(), u.getRef() );
> >>
> >>So I discovered that my NoSuchMethodError depends on u.getAuthority()
> >>method that does not exists.
> >>But also other elements do not exist ( u.getAuthority(),
> u.getUserInfo(),
> >>u.getPath(), u.getQuery()) !
> >>Besides, setURL method is not implemented, so I think it comes from
> >>URLStreamHandler. But the method from the lattest class accept only 6
> >>argouments, not 9 !
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Oooooohhhhhhhhh. You're using Java 1.1. The reason why I didn't use
> > java.net.URL from the beginning was because Java 1.1 was missing
> critical
> > URL parsing functionality. So I wrote my own parsing funcitons. Prior
> > to jcifs-0.7.0b4 we supported Java 1.1. This is no longer true. There
> > was a very small debate about this and no one seemed to be concerned
> so
> > we made the leap to the Java 2 java.net.URL. After checking
> CHANGES.txt
> > it does not appear that I meantioned this anywhere. There were so many
> > other changes it just slipped my mind. We don't see a lot of Java 1
> > users anymore.
> > 
> > Sorry, but there's nothing you can do about this. You'll have to use
> > jcifs-0.7.0b3 or less. I believe you said you're just trying to write
> a
> > "browser servlet"? 0.6.7 should work just fine for that. There are a
> > few URL bugs (hence the changes and Java 2 requirement) but nothing
> you
> > couldn't work around I think. See the Sept 26 news bullet for details.
> >
> 
> 
> -----
> 
> The information contained in this message is proprietary of Casero Inc.,
> protected from disclosure, and may be privileged. The information is
> intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s) of the
> message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, use, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from
> your computer. Thank you.
>