[jcifs] 0.6 speed!
Kurien Mathew
kurien at envivio.com
Fri Dec 7 06:23:36 EST 2001
I would agree too. Performance has improved considerably.
However when I execute "java SmbCrawler smb://workgroup 1" there is a
consistent 6 sec delay just before my host is listed. The remote hosts are
listed without any delay.
Any particular reason?
Kurien
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jcifs-admin at lists.samba.org [mailto:jcifs-admin at lists.samba.org]On
> Behalf Of Rob Wygand
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:05 AM
> To: jcifs at samba.org
> Subject: [jcifs] 0.6 speed!
>
>
> Mike, et. al.,
>
> I wanted to share with you some performance numbers we saw when
> upgrading from jCIFS 0.5r1 to 0.6b3.
>
> I ran a couple tests of browsing directories and getting file properties
> on each file in the directory, basically:
>
> Get a URL
> Create an SmbFile from it
> Call SmbFile.list()
> For each result:
> Create an SmbFile
> Call isDirectory()
> Call canRead()
> Call canWrite()
> Call getName()
> Call lastModified()
> Exit
>
> We can two sets of test, one with 1 thread doing these actions and one
> with 10 threads simultaneously performing these actions. Here are the
> results:
>
> (All times in mSec. All 10 user numbers are averages of the 10
> result times)
>
> jCIFS 0.5 jCIFS 0.6b3 GAIN
> # files: 1 user / 10 users 1 user / 10 users (1 user / 10users)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1 22 / 119 9 / 15.7 2.4x / 7.6x
> 3 466 / 1251 238 / 89.6 1.96x / 13.97x
> 20 241 / 2564 115 / 218.2 2.10x / 11.75x
> 57 541 / 6065 241 / 1707.4 2.24x / 2.55x
> 155 1923 / 23614.2 1154 / 4761 1.67x / 4.96
> 212 3434 / 39117.2 722 / 5651.7 4.75x / 6.92
>
> I'm suspicious of the 14x and 12x numbers, but everything else looks
> great! To get a 6x increase under load makes me so happy I could spit,
> to coin a phrase.
>
> Just wanted to share the perf numbers with you all...
> rjw
>
>
>
More information about the jcifs
mailing list