[distcc] distcc problems...

[Martin Pool]

On 10 Mar 2004, Daniel Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:

> Perhaps he's running distccmon on a different machine
> than the distcc client, and accessing ~/.distcc via nfs?
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=netappCJyvKo.MrI%40netcom.com
> suggests that readers should just assume files which return ESTALE
> have been deleted.  That means dcc_close should ignore ESTALE.

Good catch.  I'll do what that post suggests.

> No idea about the dcc_mon_read_state problem, though.

It's probably the same thing: the file has been removed by a distcc or
distccmon process on a different machine.

The problem of naming across machines also needs to be addressed.  It
is perhaps not as simple as just adding the hostname to each file,
because people might really want to e.g. monitor from a different
host.

-- 
Martin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/distcc/attachments/20040311/75146167/attachment.bin