[distcc] sockaddr_storage in dparent.c and prefork.c

[Harold L Hunt II]

Martin,

Martin Pool wrote:

> On 27 Nov 2003, Harold L Hunt II <huntharo at msu.edu> wrote:
> 
> 
>>>It's needed to make IPv6 support work, since sockaddr_in6 is typically
>>>bigger than sockaddr.
>>
>>Okay, that is reasonable.
>>
>>
>>>The intent of the change was that sockaddr_storage would only be used
>>>if you give --enable-rfc2553.  RFC2553 requires sockaddr_storage.  Is
>>>there a problem in how this is done?
>>
>>Hmm..., well, I don't see how that could be since there are no 
>>preprocessor protections around the sockaddr_storage structures in 
>>dparent.c and prefork.c.  I didn't pass --enable-rfc2553 to configure 
>>and I ran into build problems.  So, I guess that there must be a problem 
>>in the way that this got implemented.
> 
> 
> It's meant to be #defined in distcc.h.  I've just changed the
> replacement type to dcc_sockaddr_storage to make it more clear.
> 
> What was HAVE_SOCKADDR_STORAGE showing on Cygwin?

I don't see HAVE_SOCKADDR_STORAGE in config.log, but I do see tests for 
sockaddr_storage.  Please see the attached config.log.bz2.

Harold
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: config.log.bz2
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 8599 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/distcc/attachments/20031127/7bf31995/config.log.obj