[distcc] sockaddr_storage in dparent.c and prefork.c
Martin Pool
mbp at samba.org
Fri Nov 28 00:13:03 GMT 2003
On 27 Nov 2003, Harold L Hunt II <huntharo at msu.edu> wrote:
> >It's needed to make IPv6 support work, since sockaddr_in6 is typically
> >bigger than sockaddr.
>
> Okay, that is reasonable.
>
> >The intent of the change was that sockaddr_storage would only be used
> >if you give --enable-rfc2553. RFC2553 requires sockaddr_storage. Is
> >there a problem in how this is done?
>
> Hmm..., well, I don't see how that could be since there are no
> preprocessor protections around the sockaddr_storage structures in
> dparent.c and prefork.c. I didn't pass --enable-rfc2553 to configure
> and I ran into build problems. So, I guess that there must be a problem
> in the way that this got implemented.
It's meant to be #defined in distcc.h. I've just changed the
replacement type to dcc_sockaddr_storage to make it more clear.
What was HAVE_SOCKADDR_STORAGE showing on Cygwin?
--
Martin
linux.conf.au -- Adelaide, January 2004
More information about the distcc
mailing list