[distcc] Re: distcc 2.9 released

[Ben Elliston]

Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> writes:

> I understand, but I have no clue how to test it and I'd rather be
> safe then sorry. If I'd be sure that some of the RH compilers are
> default compilers, I'm willing to change the manufacturer field.

If you're not prepared to try, then I can't really offer any more
ideas.

> >From the few times I've seen the gcc package, I remember seperate
> patches included, which is very likely since Red Hat/Cygnus has a
> very close relation to the GCC development.

None that should be terribly visible to a user or distcc.

Ben